After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

Search found 6 matches

by dpuckett
2008-04-15 15:44
Forum: VNC-related products
Topic: TeamViewer
Replies: 31
Views: 87108

Re: TeamViewer - Free Desktop sharing

Ah ok, thats too bad. At least the 2x code is still up which has some nice features. It just needs some sort of repeater wrapper implemented which was formally done by the dyngate piece which was closed source. I noticed the recent post about Yama which appears to do just that. Hopefully someone can ...
by dpuckett
2008-04-15 15:17
Forum: VNC-related products
Topic: TeamViewer
Replies: 31
Views: 87108

Re: TeamViewer - Free Desktop sharing

Is the source code for TeamViewer 3 available for download? Does the new version not have any VNC code anymore?
by dpuckett
2007-04-10 12:37
Forum: SCIII
Topic: Stupid question
Replies: 5
Views: 10811

Re: Stupid question

Thank you snobs. As far as encryption goes. Does using SSL only create a 'gap' at the repeater where both ends are unencrypted? That is how I perceived it where using RC4 is true end2end. Or am I wrong?
by dpuckett
2007-03-23 01:00
Forum: SCIII
Topic: Stupid question
Replies: 5
Views: 10811

Re: Stupid question

Actually I have my answer. Simply use RC4 Encryption with a new key to ensure end2end encryption should protect againts certain attacks. If someone could post snobs "create your own certificate" util I would feel much more confident in implementing. Thanks
by dpuckett
2007-03-21 18:49
Forum: SCIII
Topic: Stupid question
Replies: 5
Views: 10811

Re: Stupid question

Is there any way to restrict which addresses are allowed to connect from a vncviewer_ssl without breaking the server side connection, since they both connect over port 443?
by dpuckett
2007-03-21 16:41
Forum: SCIII
Topic: Stupid question
Replies: 5
Views: 10811

Stupid question

I have things working fine using a repeater. What I have concerns about is that during my testing when I connect to the repeater using 'vncviewer_ssl.exe' I do not have to authenticate myself. What would prevent an attacker from connection to a repeater and simply attempting to connect to random ID ...