After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

Search found 10 matches

by stalks
2005-10-16 22:03
Forum: SC
Topic: Connecting to SC kills the network
Replies: 6
Views: 5654

I'll double check with the person holding the viewer that he is using version 1.0.1. He only downloaded and installed it today, he may of clicked the wrong link somehow.
by stalks
2005-10-16 21:55
Forum: SC
Topic: Connecting to SC kills the network
Replies: 6
Views: 5654

Well, the machines that are having the problems are the ones running the SC software. They are initiating an outgoing connection to a waiting vncviewer. I dont think having that viewer run on a different port is going to make any difference.

The machine that is awaiting a connection from one of my ...
by stalks
2005-10-16 20:41
Forum: SC
Topic: Connecting to SC kills the network
Replies: 6
Views: 5654

No.

Network topology is:

ADSL, 8 IP Block
Zoom x3 ADSL Router, NAT disabled.
Debian Box running iptables with source natting. Amongst other things.
-- 2 network cards, 1 going to router, 1 to a 5-port switch with internal LAN
2 PCs on LAN, the OP issue happens with both.

When the connection is ...
by stalks
2005-10-16 12:33
Forum: SC
Topic: Connecting to SC kills the network
Replies: 6
Views: 5654

Connecting to SC kills the network

I'm having a problem on 2 machines, both fresh installs a week ago, although they both have a similar software setup, hardware wise they are miles apart.

We have Computer A being either of the above mentioned PC's, and Computer B is the one with UltraVNC Viewer in Listen Mode.

A dbl clicks the SC ...
by stalks
2004-06-21 14:14
Forum: Feature requests
Topic: Windows Key + Command
Replies: 4
Views: 9277

heh :D

Another way, to make things slightly easier, is to make a shortcut on the desktop, or quick launch, or a batch file, with this command.

rundll32.exe user32.dll, LockWorkStation

Good luck. :)
by stalks
2004-06-21 13:35
Forum: Feature requests
Topic: Windows Key + Command
Replies: 4
Views: 9277

You could pass ctrl-alt-del and choose lock computer from the corresponding option window.
by stalks
2004-06-05 00:55
Forum: Feature requests
Topic: Connections between two PCs - Both behind Router
Replies: 15
Views: 19998

hm, yeah, I guess that is theoretically possible. As the NAT router will know within its own database which ports on the internal PC to actually send the packets.
by stalks
2004-06-03 22:28
Forum: Feature requests
Topic: Connections between two PCs - Both behind Router
Replies: 15
Views: 19998

Now thats interesting. The original RFC 2663 for NAT states each connection should be uniquely identified by Source IP/Port and Target IP/Port. Some companies must of decided to change this implementation specifically for peer-to-peer when both are behind NAT. Perhaps UPnP is what is being exploited ...
by stalks
2004-06-01 00:42
Forum: Feature requests
Topic: Shortcut for "request screen refresh"
Replies: 2
Views: 7379

Which weekend would this be? :)
by stalks
2004-06-01 00:42
Forum: Feature requests
Topic: Connections between two PCs - Both behind Router
Replies: 15
Views: 19998

What you are working on isnt possible with NAT. It isnt possible for you to simply pass on a connection.

The way NAT works is an outgoing connection from internal IP to outside internet is tracked, so the rebound packets, coming from the original destination back to the original sender are ...