After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

Search found 8 matches

by redndahead
2008-04-16 17:57
Forum: SC
Topic: SC + Vista Compatibility - WORKING!!!!!!
Replies: 218
Views: 760944

Re: SC + Vista Compatibility - WORKING!!!!!!

I hate that these virus companies are lazy and still detect AutoIT scripts as viruses. When they certainly are not.

Cyberdoc,

I still need to test yours out, but I have made a compiler program in AutoIT that will handle building the executable and the settings. I think it would be nice to combine ...
by redndahead
2006-06-30 07:04
Forum: Feature requests
Topic: Request for new command line options
Replies: 7
Views: 10913

Re: Request for new command line options

I wonder if it would be possible to turn on logging and parse the log file to find out who has connected.

Good Luck
by redndahead
2006-06-27 18:44
Forum: MS-Logon plugin
Topic: Using MSLOGONII from Domain to Workgroup
Replies: 4
Views: 9695

Re: Using MSLOGONII from Domain to Workgroup

Figured it out. It was the ForceGuest setting. For some reason I thought it was only required for XP Home and not Pro. It seems that when you are on the domain ForceGuest doesn't have to be 0, but when you are on a workgroup it is required to be 0 for MSLOGON II to work.

Thanks for your help anyway,
by redndahead
2006-06-27 18:07
Forum: MS-Logon plugin
Topic: Using MSLOGONII from Domain to Workgroup
Replies: 4
Views: 9695

Re: Using MSLOGONII from Domain to Workgroup

Just to confirm I switched workgroup machine from MSLOGON II to MSLOGON I and added the administrators group and marked it local.

When connecting from the Domain Machine to the Workgroup Machine it worked fine. So it definitely has something to do with connecting from a Domain Machine to a ...
by redndahead
2006-06-27 17:54
Forum: MS-Logon plugin
Topic: Using MSLOGONII from Domain to Workgroup
Replies: 4
Views: 9695

Re: Using MSLOGONII from Domain to Workgroup

I have tried all of thiese I get that the user is not Authenticated. The only difference between these machines is one is on the domain the other is not. I know I am using the right username and password.

I have used computer\user, user, user@computer, and all have not worked. I have used the local ...
by redndahead
2006-06-23 00:27
Forum: MS-Logon plugin
Topic: Using MSLOGONII from Domain to Workgroup
Replies: 4
Views: 9695

Using MSLOGONII from Domain to Workgroup

Here is the situation. I want to use MSLOGON II. One computer is on a domain the other is in a workgroup. They are all on the same network.

Viewer -> Server Auth Type Works?
DOMAIN -> Workgroup MSLOGON YES
DOMAIN -> Workgroup MSLOGON II NO
Workgroup -> DOMAIN MSLOGON II YES

I need DOMAIN ...
by redndahead
2005-08-24 16:20
Forum: Feature requests
Topic: File Transfer
Replies: 2
Views: 3923

f you don't get your option and you want a work around the hidden shares will work well.

\\PCNAME\C$
\\PCNAME\ADMIN$

etc.

Adam
by redndahead
2005-07-31 16:16
Forum: Feature requests
Topic: XML configuration vs. Windows Registry
Replies: 22
Views: 35964

there is one benefit I can see from it. If ultravnc can be pointed to look at this xml file on a remote server then it would be easy to configure a bunch with one file.

Adam