After more 2 000 000 (two million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.1.0, 1.6.3.0-dev versions
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.4.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.4.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38095
Feedback is always welcome

2025-12-14: 1.7.1.X-dev release builds need tests and feedback: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38134

2025-12-02: We need help: English Wikipedia UltraVNC page has been requested to deletion: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38127
Any help is welcome to improve the UltraVNC page and/or to comment on the Wikipedia Talk page

2025-05-06: Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

2023-09-21: Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome
Feedback is welcome

Encryption plugin for viewer

Any features you would like to see in UltraVNC? Propose it here
Post Reply
mhalliday79
Posts: 4
Joined: 2009-05-22 22:29
Location: Out of it.

Encryption plugin for viewer

Post by mhalliday79 »

I am being forced to connect to unix vncsession with realVNC to get:
Security Method: RA2
Encryption: 128-bit AES

Encoding: ZRLE

Protocol Version 4.0 (probably vnc ver.)

It would be nice to do-it-all with uVNC ! :-D
redge
1000
1000
Posts: 6797
Joined: 2004-07-03 17:05
Location: Switzerland - Geneva

Re: Encryption plugin for viewer

Post by redge »

alternativ ?
[topic=13693][/topic]
UltraVNC 1.0.9.6.1 (built 20110518)
Windows OS: XP Home + Vista Business + 7 Home
Only experienced user, [u]not[/u] developer
mhalliday79
Posts: 4
Joined: 2009-05-22 22:29
Location: Out of it.

Re: Encryption plugin for viewer

Post by mhalliday79 »

Thanks for the suggestion; however, if I'm forced to run two different VNC clients, then I'll just run uVNC and rVNC...
I like uVNC, tightVNC focused too much on JPEG compression and I didn't like the results. uVNC did everything I wanted and great speed, so I was hoping not to change again.
If Tight has the option to turn off JPEG and has File transfer and is faster than rVNC and can do RA2 security -- then maybe... :|
Post Reply