No more new addons will be implemented before 01/01/2005

Post by **Rudi De Vos** » 2004-11-04 23:42

It's time we find the latest bug and get a stable release.

Each change require a to long testing period and we never get
a stable version that way.

After 2005 we will start with a Beta II, new changes need to wait until then

[mod=2,1119896057]Removed \"important\" flag[/mod]

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 2004-11-24 13:02

hello!
i must say: good idea

.

i'm a fan of new features, but i also want a stable version. this is why i would love you guys to stop adding new features and finish a stable version

.

lizard · Post by **lizard** » 2004-11-24 14:56

That's right, indeed. Now let's just sweep bugs away!
Since around RC18 new feature requests were announced to hold until 1.0, there have been at least 5 setbacks to actually add features, FUS tweakouts, separated properties pages, MSLogon2, new FT, and single click Ultr@.
I think this is enough. What are we waiting for, when more Ultr@ amazing stuff is to be after 1.0?

ipsec · Post by **ipsec** » 2005-01-06 20:38

The devs dont like being swamped with bug issues and feature requests??

AWWW

JUST KIDDING!!

Thats a very good idea. (To push off feature requests) And if I can help I most definately will try to do that.. since that is how I am showing my thanks for your hard work and very good project...

ipsec · Post by **ipsec** » 2005-01-08 02:57

and I think you meant to say that no more additions will be added after - 01-01-05.. not before..

??

remain · Post by **remain** » 2005-01-14 17:09

I hope he didn't mean to say after...that would mean no more updates!

ipsec · Post by **ipsec** » 2005-01-15 23:52

remain wrote:I hope he didn't mean to say after...that would mean no more updates!

that would also mean that all the suggestions prior to 1/1/05 wouldnt be added.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 2005-01-16 01:48

-Dec 31, 2004
#new features implementation
#test
#bug fix

Jan 1, 2005-
#test
#bug fix

ROBOd · Post by **ROBOd** » 2005-02-24 18:37

I would suggest "No more new addons will be implemented before UltraVNC 1.0 stable". That's something we could all download and use, then we could wait for the next stable release, like 1.5.

By the way, I like very much UVNC because it has higher FPS, lower kbps (less network resources) and lower CPU usage compared to RealVNC 4. Sadly, RVNC is more stable than UVNC.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 2005-02-27 18:35

there are versions of uvnc which are very stable.
For example RC18.

But the devlopment team is never happy...