After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.1.0, 1.6.3.0-dev versions
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.4.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.4.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38095
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

IPMI support

Post Reply
Prisma
100
100
Posts: 323
Joined: 2005-10-27 15:50

IPMI support

Post by Prisma »

I know this is al little bit off topic:

Nearly all server boards have IPMI/KVM access. Nearly all boards advertise VNC on 5900 on that interface. So, what sense could it make to install an extra VNC within the OS (except file transmission)?
But I'm not able to access our SuperMicro IPMI Board. It uses RFB 3.8. But I'm always getting the message that this authentication method is not supported.

Do I need a special DSM plugin or is it otherwise supported? Or wouldn't it make sense to implement IPMI VNC access? Has this already been a request in the past?
Prisma
100
100
Posts: 323
Joined: 2005-10-27 15:50

Re: IPMI support

Post by Prisma »

LOL Are they stupid? supermicro got it done to make it that proprietary nobody can connect otherwise. Partially the can't connect themselves because some proprietary extensions are not ported to some OS... although the use generally a platform independent language. Congratulations!

OK, thanx rudi...
Post Reply