After more 2 000 000 (two million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.1.0, 1.6.3.0-dev versions
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.4.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.4.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38095
Feedback is always welcome

2025-12-14: 1.7.1.X-dev release builds need tests and feedback: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38134

2025-12-02: We need help: English Wikipedia UltraVNC page has been requested to deletion: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38127
Any help is welcome to improve the UltraVNC page and/or to comment on the Wikipedia Talk page

2025-05-06: Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

2023-09-21: Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome
Feedback is welcome

Question with Vista (15 sec delay)

Single Click discussions / bugs
Post Reply
xmatheox
Posts: 1
Joined: 2009-07-15 14:11

Question with Vista (15 sec delay)

Post by xmatheox »

Hi everyone,

I have a serious matter to support clients and I hope I can have my answer here.

What we are using is : VIEWER (let's say latest version)
- We create our support.exe from the SC Creator.

Basically it's working perfectly for XP, 2000 but with Vista I have delays of 15 seconds. What are we doing wrong, could use your help here.

Thanks
IT Technician in a company Bath Fitter
YY
200
200
Posts: 996
Joined: 2006-11-13 15:11

Re: Question with Vista (15 sec delay)

Post by YY »

I have never used the classic SC to support the Vista client, but would like to refer the following thread about some others' experience of how this problem be solved
[topic=14948]Support on with SC on Vista PCs[/topic]


Anyway, the SC is a relative older product than Vista, thus it was not designed in mind to be worked with Vista. If the above method cannot solve your problem, you may try some new generation SC solution. See
[post=59921]this thread[/post].
Post Reply