After more 2 000 000 (two million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.1.0, 1.6.3.0-dev versions
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.4.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.4.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38095
Feedback is always welcome

2025-12-14: 1.7.1.X-dev release builds need tests and feedback: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38134

2025-12-02: We need help: English Wikipedia UltraVNC page has been requested to deletion: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38127
Any help is welcome to improve the UltraVNC page and/or to comment on the Wikipedia Talk page

2025-05-06: Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

2023-09-21: Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome
Feedback is welcome

SC in readonly mode

Single Click discussions / bugs
Post Reply
jsanta

SC in readonly mode

Post by jsanta »

Hi. I'm currently giving a try to the SC Ultra VNC. For my needs it misses or appears to miss a readonly option. Already tried the

-connect 1xx.x.x.xx:5500 -noregistry -readonly

on the host parameters without any positive result.

The SC documentation says that there's support for the -readonly option, but has no other specs about that.

Am I doing anything wrong?

Thanks in advance for any answer. Greetings from Chile,

José Ignacio Santa Cruz
jsantacruz in gmail point com
Top
redge
1000
1000
Posts: 6797
Joined: 2004-07-03 17:05
Location: Switzerland - Geneva

Post by redge »

have same issue
SC 1.0.0
-connect 192.168.1.101 -readonly -noregistry
or
-connect 192.168.1.101 -noregistry -readonly

no effect, ignored ?
Last edited by redge on 2005-08-28 16:02, edited 1 time in total.
UltraVNC 1.0.9.6.1 (built 20110518)
Windows OS: XP Home + Vista Business + 7 Home
Only experienced user, [u]not[/u] developer
Top
Post Reply

Return to “SC”