After more 2 000 000 (two million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.1.0, 1.6.3.0-dev versions
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.4.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.4.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38095
Feedback is always welcome

2025-12-05: Celebrating the 23th anniversary of the UltraVNC (26th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38130

2025-12-03: Could you please complete our poll/survey? Renaming UltraVNC files and service to be more clear: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38128
There was a problem to vote, it is solved now! Thanks in advance!

2025-12-02: We need help: English Wikipedia UltraVNC page has been requested to deletion: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38127
Any help is welcome to improve the UltraVNC page and/or to comment on the Wikipedia Talk page

2025-05-06: Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

2023-09-21: Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

unnecessarily fine system timer resolution

Post Reply
pjmesq
Posts: 1
Joined: 2014-07-13 11:12

unnecessarily fine system timer resolution

Post by pjmesq »

there is a problem with most versions of the uvnc server. a call to initSDTimer results in setting the internal o/s system timing
resolution to its minimum period. this means more than 1000 interrupts per second. this is a problem on windows xp and
windows 7. this setting remains in force as long as the server is running.

the effect of this is serious for platforms with realtime requirements as well as platforms with limited power resources.

it is not clear why the standard timing resolution (about 16 milliseconds) not sufficient for the server's needs.

can this be fixed or patched?

many thanks for your attention to this...
Top
User avatar
Rudi De Vos
Admin & Developer
Admin & Developer
Posts: 6978
Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
Contact:
Contact Rudi De Vos

Re: unnecessarily fine system timer resolution

Post by Rudi De Vos »

Version with SDTimer removed
http://www.uvnc.eu/download/1204/winvnc_SDtimer.zip
UltraVNC links (join us on social networks):
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- Forum: https://forum.uvnc.com/
- GitHub sourcecode: https://github.com/ultravnc/UltraVNC
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
- uvnc2me: https://uvnc2me.com/
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Olders”